Written by Yonatan Levoritz on December 28, 2024
Who gets the house in a New York divorce? At The Levoritz Law Firm, we guide clients through the state’s equitable distribution process, where the court divides marital property fairly, though not always equally. In New York, the family home purchased during the marriage is generally considered marital property and subject to division.
A house owned by one spouse before marriage is typically treated as separate property and may be excluded, primarily if it remained separate throughout the marriage. Discover how financial contributions, child custody, and property classification can affect who keeps the home. Contact us today for personalized support.
Equitable distribution is how New York courts will divide marital property upon a divorce. It does not necessarily mean 50/50. Rather, it is a fair division between the parties based on such factors as the respective financial condition of each spouse, their respective contributions to the marriage, and what may be needed in the future.
The New York courts consider several factors in making a determination as to how marital assets, including the house, are to be divided.
In New York, the decision of who gets to stay in the marital home exclusively pending the divorce is decided upon by various factors, which all try to achieve justice and stability. The courts make their decisions based on the best interests of the children, including age, present living arrangements, and community ties. Financial situations, including income, assets, and liabilities, are also considered by the court when reaching a decision.
The second factor would be domestic violence or abuse, where the court will first consider the safety of all parties. The ability to maintain the property—including covering mortgage payments, property taxes, and upkeep—is another key factor. Prenuptial agreements and cases of abandonment are also taken into account, with decisions aligned to New York’s equitable distribution laws to achieve a just outcome for both parties.


“Many lawyers are warned not to make a case personal. But we’re fighting for people. So, while it is important to be objective, it is just as important to be empathetic with the challenges our clients are facing.”
When deciding who gets the house in a divorce in New York, judges apply the equitable distribution framework in New York Domestic Relations Law Section 236(B) (DRL § 236[B]), which focuses on fairness rather than a strict 50/50 split. The marital home is often one of the most valuable and emotionally charged assets, so the court evaluates financial realities and the well-being of any children involved.
Recent data indicate that approximately 50% of New York divorces involve minor children, making court intervention over the marital home, through awards of exclusive occupancy, sales, or transfers, common. While exact figures for each remedy are not publicly tracked, this statistic underscores how often property division decisions directly impact the family residence.
Possible court-ordered outcomes include:
As the New York City Bar Association notes, decisions weigh affordability, property maintenance capability, and the potential disruption to children.
Yes, if both spouses reach a legally binding agreement. Many couples avoid courtroom disputes by setting out ownership terms in a settlement agreement. This can resolve who will keep the home, how equity will be distributed, and who will handle outstanding mortgage obligations.
Common approaches include:
Even when you avoid the courtroom, agreements should be properly drafted and filed with the court as part of the divorce to make them legally enforceable under DRL § 236(B).
Retaining the marital home can be emotionally reassuring, but may create long-term financial strain. Before committing, assess both immediate and ongoing costs:
In the New York metro area, about 2.2% of mortgages are at least 30 days delinquent, with 0.7% more than 90 days overdue—a reminder that even modest financial stress can lead to payment difficulties. Choosing to keep the home without adequate resources can leave you with substantial equity but insufficient liquid funds to manage expenses.
Under DRL § 236(B), marital property is generally any asset acquired by either spouse during the marriage, regardless of whose name appears on the deed or title. Separate property includes assets owned before marriage, inheritances, and certain third-party gifts.
However, property classification is not always straightforward. A home purchased before marriage may become marital if:
Financial records and credible testimony are key in determining whether separate property claims hold up in court.
A wife in Manhattan has a right to share the marital property that could include real estate, among others, acquired during the course of the marriage. She can also be entitled to spousal maintenance, at the discretion of the financial condition of both spouses.
Generally, no, unless the property was converted into marital property through commingling or substantial contributions by your spouse. Under DRL § 236(B), a home purchased before marriage is typically considered separate property. However, specific actions can change that classification. If marital funds were used for mortgage payments, significant renovations, or taxes, the court may view part, or all, of the home’s value as marital. Adding your spouse to the deed also creates a presumption of shared ownership. The longer the marriage and the greater the marital investment, the stronger your spouse’s claim may become.
Yes, if valid, they can override default property division rules. A prenuptial agreement under New York law can clearly define whether the marital home is treated as separate or marital property. It can also set specific terms for buyouts, exclusive occupancy, or sale in the event of divorce. For the agreement to be enforceable, it must be in writing, signed voluntarily, and meet disclosure requirements. Courts will uphold these agreements unless proven unconscionable or signed under duress.
The court will decide based on financial capacity, child custody, and equitable distribution principles. In many contested cases, the judge considers who can afford the property independently, who has primary custody of minor children, and whether a buyout is feasible. If neither party can manage the costs alone or agree on terms, the court may order the home sold and the proceeds divided. In high-conflict situations, a neutral appraiser may be appointed to determine the property’s fair market value.
A partition action allows the court to force the sale or division of jointly owned property. This is often used in Manhattan when co-owners, whether divorcing spouses or former partners, cannot agree on what to do with shared property. The court can order the property sold at market value or, in rare cases, physically divided if feasible. Partition actions are separate legal proceedings but may be joined with a divorce if ownership disputes remain unresolved. They are a last resort when negotiation fails.
Yes, but the proceeds are typically placed in escrow or otherwise safeguarded until the divorce is finalized. Selling before the case concludes can be practical when neither spouse wishes to keep the property, but it requires court approval to prevent disputes over the division of proceeds. The funds are then distributed as part of the final settlement or judgment under DRL § 236(B). This approach can also avoid ongoing carrying costs, but parties should carefully document the sale terms and ensure compliance with court orders.
When it comes to who gets the house in a divorce in Manhattan, timing and strategy matter. The Levoritz Law Firm has the experience to protect your home and financial future. Call (718) 942-4004 today for a confidential consultation and start building a plan that safeguards what matters most to you.
Meet Yonatan Levoritz, the founder of Levoritz Law Firm, recognized for his exceptional skill in family law, his compassionate manner, and his commitment to achieving favorable outcomes for his clients. Yonatan Levoritz has a long record of winning challenging and complex cases.
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by Founding Partner, Yonatan Levoritz who has more than 20 years of legal experience as a divorce & family attorney.